How To Map a CXL Endpoint to a CPU Socket in Linux

How To Map a CXL Endpoint to a CPU Socket in Linux

When working with CXL Type 3 Memory Expander endpoints, it’s nice to know which CPU Socket owns the root complex for the endpoint. This is very useful for memory tiering solutions where we want to keep the execution of application processes and threads ’local’ to the memory.

CXL memory expanders appear in Linux as memory-only or cpu-less NUMA Nodes. For example, NUMA nodes 2 & 3 do not have any CPUs assigned to them.

# numactl -H
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155
node 0 size: 64167 MB
node 0 free: 62245 MB
node 1 cpus: 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207
node 1 size: 64472 MB
node 1 free: 61391 MB
node 2 cpus:
node 2 size: 65536 MB
node 2 free: 65535 MB
node 3 cpus:
node 3 size: 131072 MB
node 3 free: 131070 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3 
  0:  10  21  14  24 
  1:  21  10  24  14 
  2:  14  24  10  26 
  3:  24  14  26  10

In a previous post , I described how to use Persistent Memory to expand the main memory available to the system and showed a similar example. CXL memory expanders work similarly, however, they are physical devices on the PCIe bus, either locally attached to a physical PCIe slot or through a PCIe switch. The question becomes, which CPU has the ownership (root complex/port) for the endpoint? Have we successfully balanced the CXL devices across CPU sockets, or did we intentionally or accidentally put everything on the same CPU socket, which could lead to memory performance problems.

In this host, we have two physical CXL memory expansion devices (I intentionally removed the vendor information and replaced it with ‘x’)

# lspci | grep CXL 
38:00.0 CXL: xxxxxxxxxx Device c000 (rev 01)
b8:00.0 CXL: xxxxxxxxxx Device c000 (rev 01)

Method 1 - Using the PCIe sysfs interface

If we examine each device through the sysfs interface, we can obtain the list of CPUs and primary NUMA Node, ie:

# cd /sys/devices/pci0000:38/0000:38:00.0
# cat numa_node 
0
# cat local_cpulist 
0-51,104-155

# cd /sys/devices/pci0000:b8/0000:b8:00.0
# cat numa_node 
1
# cat local_cpulist
52-103,156-207

Method 2 - Using the CXL memdev sysfs interface

If the CXL device is managed by the cxl_mem driver, we can get the primary NUMA Node from that entry, but not the list of CPUs, eg:

# cat /sys/bus/cxl/devices/mem0/numa_node
0
# cat /sys/bus/cxl/devices/mem1/numa_node 
1

Method 3 - Using lspci

Using the lspci utility to obtain the ‘NUMA’ information, eg:

# lspci -s 38:00.0 -vvv | grep -i numa
	NUMA node: 0
# lspci -s b8:00.0 -vvv | grep -i numa
	NUMA node: 1

The lspci -t command to show the tree doesn’t show the root complex/port for each CPU.

How To Install and Boot Microsoft Hyper-V 2019 from Persistent Memory (or not)

How To Install and Boot Microsoft Hyper-V 2019 from Persistent Memory (or not)

In a previous post  I described how to install and boot Fedora Linux using only Persistent Memory, no SSDs are required. For this follow on post, I attempted to install Microsoft Windows Server 2022 onto the persistent memory.

TL;DR - I was able to select the PMem devices as the install disk, but when the installer begins to write data, we get an “Error code: 0xC0000005”. I haven’t found a solution to this problem (yet).

Read More
How Much RAM Could a Vector Database Use If a Vector Database Could Use RAM

How Much RAM Could a Vector Database Use If a Vector Database Could Use RAM

Featured image generated by ChatGPT 4o model: “a low poly woodchuck by a serene lake, surrounded by mountains and a forest with tree leaves made from DDR memory modules. The woodchuck is munching on a memory DIMM. The only memory DIMM in the image should be the one being eaten.”

How Much RAM Could a Vector Database Use If a Vector Database Could Use RAM?

Although the title is a punn from the famous “woodchuck rhyme,” the question is serious for LLM applications using vector databases. As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, leveraging vector databases to store and search embeddings is critical. Understanding the memory usage of these systems is essential for maintaining performance, response times, and ensuring system scalability.

Read More
Understanding Memory Usage with `smem`

Understanding Memory Usage with `smem`

Memory management is crucial for Linux administrators and developers, especially when optimizing performance for resource-intensive applications. While tools like top and htop are commonly used to monitor system performance, they often don’t provide enough detail regarding memory usage breakdown. This is where smem comes into play.

What is smem?

smem is a command-line tool that reports memory usage per process and provides better insight into shared memory than most traditional tools, taking shared memory pages into account. Unlike top or htop, which primarily display RSS (Resident Set Size), smem can also show USS (Unique Set Size), which is a better metric for understanding how much memory would be freed if a particular process were terminated. This blog will guide you through using smem, explaining these critical memory metrics and providing comparisons to more familiar tools.

Read More